Researcher into science, algorithms & public policy.
I'm based at the Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy (UCL STEaPP) at University College London, where I am a doctoral researcher focussing on science advice to policy in the area of machine learning Machine learning algorithms can learn from data, perceiving often complex and subtle patterns that may elude or overwhelm other methods. They can use this understanding to answer queries about the areas 'learnt' about, often — but not always — displaying remarkable accuracy. and decision-making algorithms. I believe that in order to get the most societal benefit from these powerful tools, we need to build the capacity to understand them in all sectors. This will help enable informed debate, solid governance, and deployment for long-term societal benefit.
I'm supervised by Dr. Jason Blackstock and Prof. Anthony Finkelstein.
I've previously worked in the European Commission on the nexus of health, technology and ageing; at Bonsucro, an innovative metric sustainability certification for sugarcane designing data processing and visualisation strategies; and in a range of consulting roles on technology, sustainability and policy.
I tweet @mikarv, and can also be found on LinkedIn. You can also pop me an email at firstname.lastname@example.org, or drop me a line at +44 (0) 20 3108 9736. A PGP public key for me can be found on keybase.io.
We consider the opportunities of an emerging range of sustainability standards measuring performance on dimensions of sustainability rather than prescribing particular technologies. Veale, M and Seixas, R (2015). Moving to metrics: Opportunities and challenges of performance based sustainability standards. S.A.P.I.EN.S. 8(1). https://sapiens.revues.org/pdf/1713
Selected blogs and reviews
"We must invent better ways of measuring and understanding the algorithms’ impact over time, and their interaction with the social, technical and environmental systems we connect them to."
"Given even their programmers cannot rigorously ‘interpret’ the decision processes used by their creations, how can algorithms be put up for public debate?"